Chapter 3376: 【3376】Take advantage of the brain
Never look at what this person says, look at what this person does. As Zeng Wanning himself said, if you don\'t have money, you may not love your daughter. As a result, Mama Wang gave an explanation. In contrast, the fact that the Zeng family didn\'t want to do anything to save their daughter-in-law from the beginning cannot be washed away. It can only be said that the Zeng family is too diverting the attention of others.
How to divert public attention? The sins that cannot be washed away by oneself can only be created and framed by rumors to others.
For example, Mama Zeng accused Mama Wang that her son was cheating. Guess who said it was cheating first. It was Zeng\'s mother who said that her daughter-in-law cheated first. Mama Wang can only fight back and say that it is possible that your son has cheated, but it is impossible for my daughter to cheat. Mama Wang\'s words made some sense when you listened carefully.
Mother Zeng, who said that her daughter-in-law was cheating, couldn\'t find any evidence that her daughter-in-law was hooking up with her, why would she suddenly talk about her daughter-in-law cheating in the first place. Is it a whim to fantasize about a daughter-in-law cheating?
If Zeng\'s mother cheated on her own son, what should Zeng\'s mother do? There is a way to quickly say that if the daughter-in-law cheats first, others will not blame her son for cheating.
"Everyone knows that her daughter cheated." Zeng\'s mother really planned this, and shouted again to let everyone pay attention to her daughter-in-law, "Your doctor can ask the neighbors and friends around us to verify, everyone knows It was her daughter who cheated, not my son."
There is an advantage to framing the blame first. This advantage has a term in medical psychology called the Mandela effect.
As long as you create a piece of news for everyone first, even if the news is fake, it will be preconceived in the brains of the people around you. It is difficult for people to accept the fact that the news they have already identified is fake, and they will desperately support fake news as a real memory. It is equivalent to turning the fake into the real after the fake can become real.
This collective misprinting of disinformation caused by the spread of false information was studied many years later as the Mandela effect.
Do you think the Zeng family understands the Mandela effect? The Mandela effect did not appear in this era.
The Zeng family is just the way the neural network lines of their brains go, and the behavioral logic is what we commonly call bad guys. From a medical point of view, the ideological and moral line of the brain is bad, and it is completely bad. If there is a problem with personality, there is a problem with the brain.
Is this bad brain medically a disease? Not sick.
Medicine cannot cure a bad brain, only the law can cure a bad brain. But medicine has studied this pattern of human brain behavior. It is equivalent to saying that this little trick to damage the brain cannot be concealed from medical experts. This is why Xie Wanying said at the beginning that all conspiracies and tricks can only be destroyed in the face of medical technical strength.
Without giving an example of the Mandela effect, Xie Wanying cites a saying to the Zeng family: "Everyone speaks for money, and it accumulates and destroys bones. Why is the spread of rumors so effective, because the human brain is used to read and organize information into pieces. transformation and brain supplementation.”
This is how the human brain reads information. When reading a book, most people like to see ten lines at a time. The words and sentences in the reader\'s mind mainly grasp the key information of a few words, and other information is supplemented by themselves, which fully shows the human brain\'s self-righteous nature. Therefore, a thousand readers of the same book have a thousand Hamlets in their hearts.
"You can\'t deny the truth by saying this. My neighbors and friends know all about it." Mother Zeng pouted her stubborn face, "Is it possible that all of them are false?"